Informal Fallacy: Argument from Repetition


The argument from repetition, also known as argumentum ad nauseam, is a logical fallacy that occurs when a statement is repeated so frequently that it is accepted as true without supporting evidence. Argument from repetition is a rhetorical device used to make a point by repeating the same argument over and over again. This technique is often used to emphasize a particular point, persuade others to agree with a particular viewpoint, or to create a sense of certainty and credibility. 

  • Examples:

  1. In physiology, this fallacy might manifest as the repeated assertion that a specific diet universally leads to better health, despite conflicting studies. 
  2. In medicine, it could be the persistent claim that a particular drug is effective, ignoring evidence of adverse effects or limited efficacy. 
  3. Pharmacy may see this fallacy in the form of repeated endorsements of a supplement's benefits without substantial clinical trials.
  4. In astronomy, one might encounter the repeated proclamation of an impending catastrophic event, like an asteroid impact, without credible scientific backing. 
  5. In dentistry, the fallacy might appear as the continuous promotion of a specific treatment as the best option, without considering individual patient needs or alternative treatments.
  6. In dentistry, a specific dental practice might be deemed necessary due to constant repetition in dental literature, disregarding the need for updated clinical trials. 
  7. In neurology, the oft-repeated myth that humans use only 10% of their brains persists despite neurological evidence to the contrary.
  8. Economics can be influenced by the repeated assertion that a particular policy will lead to economic growth, even if data suggests otherwise. 
  9. Economics can suffer from this fallacy when a particular economic policy is advocated over and over again without proper analysis of its outcomes.
  10. Political discourse is rife with this fallacy, where a slogan or idea is repeated until it is uncritically accepted by the public. 

Conclusion:

Argument from repetition is a powerful rhetorical device that is commonly used to convey a message, persuade others, and establish the validity of a particular idea or theory. Recognizing the argument from repetition fallacy is crucial across all fields to ensure that conclusions are based on evidence and sound reasoning, rather than the persuasive power of repeated assertions.

Points to Ponder:

One always need to be vigilant to persistent media claims.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Deserts: Classifications

CELL: FUNCTIONS

Earth: Hydrosphere